Sat, May 31, 2025
Volume 18, Issue 5 (Sep-Oct 2024)
mljgoums 2024, 18(5): 18-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Harrison A, Prabha A, Krishna K, Viknesh Marudhadurai V, Chikkegowda J, Choudhary R. The cut-off values of discriminator indices for screening of beta-thalassemia trait. mljgoums 2024; 18 (5) :18-23
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1753-en.html
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1753-en.html
Aradhana Harrison1 
, Aswathy Prabha2 , Karishma Krishna2 , Vejay Viknesh Marudhadurai2 , Jahnavi Chikkegowda2 , Rajshree Choudhary2
, Aswathy Prabha2 , Karishma Krishna2 , Vejay Viknesh Marudhadurai2 , Jahnavi Chikkegowda2 , Rajshree Choudhary2
1- Department of Pathology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore-560074, KA, India , aradhanaharrison@gmail.com
2- Department of Pathology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore-560074, KA, India
2- Department of Pathology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore-560074, KA, India
Abstract: (1025 Views)
Background: β-thalassemia trait (BTT) can be screened by several discriminator indices (DIs) using complete blood counts (CBC). These DIs can help differentiate BTT from other causes of anaemia, thus reducing the financial burden of laboratory testing. At standard cut-off values, statistical analyses traditionally used to compare the diagnostic competence of these DIs give variable results. This study establishes new optimal cut-off values to improve the applicability of these DIs for BTT screening.
Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on anaemic adults whose high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and CBC results achieved over the past 6 months were reviewed. Based on HPLC reports, patients were categorised into BTT and non-BTT groups, with each group comprising 25 age- and sex-matched patients. Discriminator indices, including Mentzer’s Index (MI), Green and King Index (GKI), Sehgal Index (SI), Shine and Lal Index (SLI), Srivastava Index (SrI), and England and Fraser Index (EFI), were calculated for both groups. Statistical analysis was performed respective to standard cut-off values to establish new optimal cut-off values with the highest sensitivity and specificity.
Results: According to the results, SrI emerged as the best index, offering high sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s Index, accuracy, and odds ratio. On the other side, SLI and GKI were observed to be poor indices with low sensitivity and specificity. The new optimal cut-off values for the best performance of each DI for BTT screening were as follows: SrI ≤3.5, MI ≤11.4, GKI ≤59.7, SI ≤709.4, SLI ≤941.1, and EFI ≤1.91.
Conclusion: The performance of DIs at standard cut-off values was poor to screen BTT. New optimal cut-off values provided maximal sensitivity and specificity thereby enhancing their performance as screening parameters for BTT in regions with a high-prevalence of the condition. Further studies are warranted to substantiate the new cut-off values for BTT screening.
Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on anaemic adults whose high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and CBC results achieved over the past 6 months were reviewed. Based on HPLC reports, patients were categorised into BTT and non-BTT groups, with each group comprising 25 age- and sex-matched patients. Discriminator indices, including Mentzer’s Index (MI), Green and King Index (GKI), Sehgal Index (SI), Shine and Lal Index (SLI), Srivastava Index (SrI), and England and Fraser Index (EFI), were calculated for both groups. Statistical analysis was performed respective to standard cut-off values to establish new optimal cut-off values with the highest sensitivity and specificity.
Results: According to the results, SrI emerged as the best index, offering high sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s Index, accuracy, and odds ratio. On the other side, SLI and GKI were observed to be poor indices with low sensitivity and specificity. The new optimal cut-off values for the best performance of each DI for BTT screening were as follows: SrI ≤3.5, MI ≤11.4, GKI ≤59.7, SI ≤709.4, SLI ≤941.1, and EFI ≤1.91.
Conclusion: The performance of DIs at standard cut-off values was poor to screen BTT. New optimal cut-off values provided maximal sensitivity and specificity thereby enhancing their performance as screening parameters for BTT in regions with a high-prevalence of the condition. Further studies are warranted to substantiate the new cut-off values for BTT screening.
Research Article: Original Paper |
Subject:
Laboratory hematology
Received: 2023/11/30 | Accepted: 2024/10/19 | Published: 2025/04/16 | ePublished: 2025/04/16
Received: 2023/11/30 | Accepted: 2024/10/19 | Published: 2025/04/16 | ePublished: 2025/04/16
References
1. Vasilopoulou M, Stafylidis C, Politou M. The thrombotic spectrum of B-thalassemia. Thrombosis Update. 2022; 7: 100102. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Jaing TH, Chang TY, Chen SH, Lin CW, Wen YC, Chiu CC. Molecular genetics of β-thalassemia: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 12:(45): e27522. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. McPherson RA, Pincus MR. Erythrocyte Disorders. In. Henry's clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 24th Ed. Saunders Elsevier. 2022; 577-91. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
4. Galanello R. Screening And Diagnosis For Haemoglobin Disorders. In: Angastiniotis M, Eleftheriou A, Galanello R. Prevention of Thalassaemias and Other Haemoglobin Disorders: Volume 1: Principles. 2nd ed. Cyprus: Thalassaemia International Federation; 2013. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
5. Rauf S, Shamshad GU, Mushtaq F, Khan SA, Ali N. Diagnosing Beta Thalassemia trait in a developing country. Acta Haematologica Polonica. 2017; 48(1): 18-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Koch C, Roberts K, Petruccelli C, Morgan DJ. The Frequency of Unnecessary Testing in Hospitalized Patients. Am J Med. 2018; 131(5): 500-503. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Bhati D, Deogade MS, Kanyal D. Improving Patient Outcomes Through Effective Hospital Administration: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2023; 15(10): e47731. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Sinha S, Seth T, Colah RB, Bittles AH. Haemoglobinopathies in India: estimates of blood requirements and treatment costs for the decade 2017-2026. J Community Genet. 2020; 11(1): 39-45. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Bhargava M, Kumar V, Pandey H, Singh V, Misra V, Gupta P. Role of Hematological Indices as a Screening Tool of Beta Thalassemia Trait in Eastern Uttar Pradesh: An Institutional Study. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2020; 36(4): 719-724. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Singh V, Chaudhary D, Gupta R. Screening Beta Thalassemia Trait- Performance Evaluation of Discriminator Indices. Nat J Laboratory Med. 2020; 9(4): 1-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Tabassum S, Khakwani M, Fayyaz A, Taj N. Role of Mentzer index for differentiating iron deficiency anemia and beta thalassemia trait in pregnant women. Pak J Med Sci. 2022; 38(4Part-II): 878-882. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Wickramaratne KAC, Wijewickrama DC. Screening for beta-thalassemia trait; applicability of red cell indices and parameters - A study in Sri Lanka. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2021; 15(1): 29-34. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Sehgal K, Mansukhani P, Dadu T, Irani M, Khodaiji S. Sehgal index: A new index and its comparison with other complete blood count-based indices for screening of beta thalassemia trait in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015; 58(3): 310-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Jahangiri M, Rahim F, Malehi AS. Diagnostic performance of hematological discrimination indices to discriminate between βeta thalassemia trait and iron deficiency anemia and using cluster analysis: Introducing two new indices tested in Iranian population. Sci Reparation. 2019; 9(1): 18610. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Lucy A, McNamara, Martin SW. Principles of Epidemiology and Public Health. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Editor(s): Sarah S. Long, Charles G. Prober, Marc Fischer, Elsevier. 2018; Pages 1-9.e1. [View at Publisher]
16. Trevethan R. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice. Front Public Health. 2017; 5: 307. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Montano M. Blood biomarkers: overview of existing serum test strategies for disease severity, risk for progression, therapeutic benchmark targets. Translational Biology in Medicine Volume 1. 1st ed. Woodhead Publishing. 2014; 35-62. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
18. Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, El Ashal G. Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity. Emerg. 2015; 3(2): 48-9. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF. Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J. 2008; 50(3): 419-30. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Kallner A. Formulas. In: Laboratory Statistics. 2nd ed. Elsevier. 2018; 1-140. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
21. Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 19(3): 227-9. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Unal I. Defining an Optimal Cut-Point Value in ROC Analysis: An Alternative Approach. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017; 2017: 3762651. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Kattamis A, Forni GL, Aydinok Y, Viprakasit V. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of β-thalassemia. Eur J Haematol. 2020; 105(6): 692-703. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Surjawan Y, Tan H, Dharma R, Rositawati W. Early Screening of Hemoglobinopathy in Indonesia Using Erythrocyte Indices. The Indonesian Biomedical Journal. 2017; 9(22): 9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Rastogi N, Bhake AS. Sehgal index and its comparison with Mentzer's index and Green and King index in assessment of peripheral blood smear with marked anisopoikilocytosis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020; 8(8): 2972-2977. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26. Singh N, Chowdhury N, Bahadur A, Ahuja S, Arathi K, Jeladharan R, et al. Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Screening in Women Attending Antenatal Clinic at a Tertiary Care Center in Uttarakhand, India: A Re-look at the Laboratory Parameters Mandating High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Workup. Cureus. 2023; 15(6): e40667. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Reis FMP, Andrade RR, Rodrigues CFS, Barbosa FT. Discriminant indexes to simplify the differential diagnosis between iron deficiency anemia and thalassemia minor in individuals with microcytic anemia. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020; 66(9): 1277-1282. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Enamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.