Showing 3 results for bhat
Harsha Jaykar, Mangala Nagare, Gauri Bhat,
Volume 16, Issue 6 (Special issue (Nov-Dec) 2022)
Abstract
Background and objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a communicable disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 vary from asymptomatic to acute respiratory distress syndrome. In severely-ill patients, neutrophil count is significantly increased. This study aimed to evaluate absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in patients with COVID-19 and healthy individuals.
Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients admitted to the outpatient department of OBGY Rural Hospital (Maharashtra, India) from April 2021 to June 2021. A peripheral venous blood sample (3 ml) was taken from 143 patients with COVID-19 and 143 healthy controls. The blood samples were analyzed using a fully automated blood cell counter for the estimation of complete blood count. A peripheral blood smear was prepared and stained with Leishman stain for evaluation of morphological changes.
Results: The ANC of COVID-19 patients was significantly higher than that of healthy control subjects (p=0.00001). Toxic granules (48.9%) were the most common morphological neutrophil abnormality, followed by hypolobation, hypogranulation, Pseudo-Pelger-Huet anomaly (20.9%), and shift to left with the presence of immature myeloid series cells.
Conclusion: High ANC along with morphological changes in neutrophils could be used as a simple and inexpensive surrogate marker of COVID-19 and its severity.
Sadaf Khursheed Baba, Abiroo Jan, Mohd Suhail Lone, Dalip K Kakru, Bashir Ahmad Fomda, Gulnaz Bashir, Nadeem Ahmad Bhat,
Volume 17, Issue 3 (May-Jun 2023)
Abstract
Background and objectives: Conventional culture and sensitivity methods take around 48 hours to generate antibiotic sensitivity results after a blood culture is flagged as positive by automated systems. However, it is imperative to initiate early targeted antibiotic therapy for effective management of sepsis and to reduce morbidity, mortality, and cost of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the direct sensitivity test (DST) as a potential tool to obtain quicker antibiotic susceptibility results from positive BacT/ALERT blood culture vials and the VITEK-2 system (the reference method).
Methods: Blood culture bottles flagged as positive by BacT/ALERT were Gram-stained. Cultures with polymicrobial growth were excluded from the study. The isolates were then simultaneously cultured and processed for the DST using the disk diffusion method. Agreements or errors were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s guidelines.
Results: Among 76 Gram-positive isolates, we observed 99.2% essential agreement between the DST and AST. The rate of minor and major errors was 4.04% and 1.18%, respectively. Among 75 Gram-negative isolates, we observed 98.99% essential agreement between the DST and AST. The rate of minor and major errors was 4% and 2%, respectively. No very major error was seen in either Gram-negative or -positive isolates.
Conclusions: The DST results are available earlier than the AST results, which can ultimately help in the early initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy.
Sujata Lall , Vivek Bhat, Sanjay Biswas, Navin Khattry ,
Volume 18, Issue 4 (Jul-Aug 2024)
Abstract
Background: Tigecycline susceptibility testing and reporting remain enigmatic due to the lack of established guidelines. Disc diffusion, as a method of performing susceptibility testing, is more widely accepted worldwide due to its ease of use. Limited published literature is available from India on the utility of this method, especially in a cancer care setting. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the performance characteristics of disc diffusion by comparing its results with those of the VITEK-2 COMPACT, considering the latter as the standard.
Methods: Disc diffusion was performed using Kirby-Bauer’s method on Mueller-Hinton agar with a HiMedia 15 mcg TGC disc, following FDA and EUCAST breakpoints. According to CLSI criteria, disc diffusion breakpoints can be considered acceptable when categorical agreement is ≥ 90%, the very major error is ≤ 1.5%, and the major error is ≤ 3%.
Results: Using Cohen’s kappa coefficient, the kappa value was 0.328, with a p-value of <0.05. The agreement percentage observed was 60.84%. Two strains reported as resistant by VITEK-2 COMPACT were misclassified as sensitive by disc diffusion, resulting in a very major error rate of 0.76%. A major error rate of 9.5% and a minor error rate of 27.7% were noted, as 25 strains reported as susceptible were identified as resistant.
Conclusion: Since poor agreement was observed, exceeding the acceptable performance rate, the disc diffusion method was unacceptable according to CLSI criteria. There is a gap in uniformity and a lack of streamlined, harmonized TST, which might become an alarming cause for concern.
